**Document:** Planning Officer Report
**Application:** 07/01481/B — Conversion of existing garage / storage into ancillary guest and / or tourist accommodation
**Decision:** Application Withdrawn
**Decision Date:** 2007-10-11
**Parish:** Bride
**Document Type:** report / officer_report
**Source:** https://planningportal.im/a/83767-bride-ballacregga-farm-conversion-garage/documents/1508677

---

# Planning Officer Report

## Planning Report And Recommendations [Table omitted in markdown export] ### Considerations [Table omitted in markdown export] ### Written Representations ### Consultations [Table omitted in markdown export] [Table omitted in markdown export] [Table omitted in markdown export] [Table omitted in markdown export]

### Officer's Report

#### The Application Site

The application site is the residential curtilage of Ballacregga Farm, Lhen Road, Bride, which is located on the northern side of the Lhen Road and northwest of Bride Village.

Within the curtilage of the site consists a double garage/store. The site is very well screened from the highway due to significant trees and hedges which surround the site boundaries and run adjacent to the northern side of the Lhen Road.

#### Planning Policy

The application site is within an area recognised as being an area of 'white land & woodland' not zoned for development, under the Isle of Man Development Plan Order 1982. The site is not within a

Conservation Area; however the site is within an area zoned as High Landscape or Coastal Value and Scenic Significance.

- Isle of Man Planning Scheme (Development Plan) Order 1982
- Planning Circular 1/88 – Residential Development in the Countryside
- The Isle of Man Strategic Plan (20th June 2007) – General Policy 3, Environment Policy 2, Housing Policy 11, and Business Policy 11 & 12

### Planning History

Removal of condition 3 from approved 03/00733/B to allow the building to be used as a single dwelling house - 07/01252/B – Ballacregga, Lhen Road, Bride - DECESION PENDING

Conversion of outbuilding to a dwelling - 03/00733/B - Ballacregga Farm, Lhen Road, Bride – APPROVED Alterations and extension to dwelling and erection of garage/workshop - 98/01322/B - Ballacregga Farm, Lhen Road, Bride – APPROVED Refurbishment of existing farmhouse - 92/00067/B - Ballacregga Farm, Bride – APPROVED Installation of roof lights - 90/01804/B - Ballacregga Farm, Bride – APPROVED

### Proposal

The application proposes the conversion of existing garage / storage into ancillary guest and / or tourist accommodation.

### Representations

S.P.M.C. & E:-

07/1252 (still outstanding, we believe?) sought the relaxation of a tourist occupancy condition on premises hereabouts. It seems perverse that we are now considering proposals for further tourist uses here. However as this modern brick or block building can hardly be considered vernacular, the case for conversion under Circular 3/89 or ISP Policy 16 b) fails. The Society Objects to what will become an additional house in the countryside.

The IOM Water Authority makes no comment on the merit of the proposed development but request that an informative note be attached to any approval decision notice.

The Planning Authority has received no privately written representations objecting to the application.

### Assessment / Recommendation

The proposed conversion of the existing garage, which benefited from planning approval (98/01322/B) in 1998, requires the following Planning Policies to be taken into account when reaching a decision.

#### General

**Policy 3:** Development will not be permitted outside of those areas which are zoned for development on the appropriate Area Plan with the exception of:

- (a) essential housing for agricultural workers who have to live close to their place of work; (Housing Policies 7, 8, 9 and 10);

- (b) conversion of redundant rural buildings which are of architectural, historic, or social value and interest; (Housing Policy 11);

- (c) previously developed land(1) which contains a significant amount of building; where the continued use is redundant; where redevelopment would reduce the impact of the current situation on the landscape or the wider environment; and where the development proposed would result in improvements to the landscape or wider environment;

- (d) the replacement of existing rural dwellings; (Housing Policies 12, 13 and 14);
- (e) location-dependent development in connection with the working of minerals or the provision of necessary services;
- (f) building and engineering operations which are essential for the conduct of agriculture or forestry;
- (g) development recognised to be of overriding national need in land use planning terms and for which there is no reasonable and acceptable alternative; and
- (h) buildings or works required for interpretation of the countryside, its wildlife or heritage.

### Environment

#### Policy 2:

The present system of landscape classification of Areas of High Landscape or Coastal Value and Scenic Significance (AHLV's) as shown on the 1982 Development Plan and subsequent Local and Area Plans will be used as a basis for development control until such time as it is superseded by a landscape classification which will introduce different categories of landscape and policies and guidance for control therein. Within these areas the protection of the character of the landscape will be the most important consideration unless it can be shown that:

- (a) the development would not harm the character and quality of the landscape; or
- (b) the location for the development is essential.

### Housing

#### Policy 11:

Conversion of existing rural buildings into dwellings may be permitted, but only where:
- (a) redundancy for the original use can be established;
- (b) the building is substantially intact and structurally capable of renovation;
- (c) the building is of architectural, historic, or social interest;
- (d) the building is large enough to form a satisfactory dwelling, either as it stands or with modest, subordinate extension which does not affect adversely the character or interest of the building;
- (e) residential use would not be incompatible with adjoining established uses or, where appropriate, land-use zonings on the area plan; and
- (f) the building is or can be provided with satisfactory services without unreasonable public expenditure.

Such conversion must:
- (a) where practicable and desirable, re-establish the original appearance of the building; and
- (b) use the same materials as those in the existing building.

Permission will not be given for the rebuilding of ruins or the erection of replacement buildings of similar, or even identical, form.

Further extension of converted rural buildings will not usually be permitted, since this would lead to loss or reduction of the original interest and character.

### Business

#### Policy 11:

Tourism development must be in accordance with the sustainable development objectives of this plan; policies and designations which seek to protect the countryside from development will be applied to tourist development with as much weight as they are to other types of development. Within the rural areas there may be situations where existing rural buildings could be used for tourist use and Environment Policy 16 sets out the circumstances where this may be permitted.

Business Policy 12: Permission will generally be given for the conversion of redundant buildings in the countryside to tourist use providing that the development complies with the policies set out in paragraph 8.10. – Housing Policy 11.

Assessment The proposal would create a two bedroom self-contained tourist unit/ancillary accommodation, which would be equipped with a living/kitchen/dining area and a bathroom, which is considered to be tantamount to a new dwelling in the countryside in terms of its use and its appearance. Whilst a condition could be attached tying the occupation of the new building to that of the main house, the fact remains that it is a self-contained unit which looks like and for all intents and purposes is, a new dwelling in an area which is not designated for such development.

As identified earlier, within the planning policy, this presumption against is set out in three ways. Firstly, the application site is not zoned for residential development under the 1982 Development Plan Order. Secondly, General Policy 3 of the Isle of Man Strategic Plan, states that in such areas only conversion of redundant rural buildings which are of architectural, historic, or social value and interest would be permitted outside those areas which are not zoned for development. Thirdly, Housing Policy 11 also states that conversion of existing rural buildings into dwellings may be permitted, but only where, redundancy for the original use can be established and the building is of architectural, historic, or social interest. I consider the proposal would not comply with the criteria as indicated, and therefore there are no special circumstances to warrant the setting aside of the presumption against. The development proposed by this planning application is therefore clearly contrary to the current policies of the Department.

Additionally, whilst the proposal is a conversion of an existing building, consideration needs to be taken, that the loss of the existing double garage might result in a further application for a new replacement garage, within an area not zoned for development.

A similar application for alterations and extension to provide two units of holiday accommodation - 06/01268/B - Annex / Garages, The Old School House, Tholt Y Will, Sulby, was recently refused at Appeal. This application proposed two tourist units compared to one proposed with this application, however the principle for development is the same. With this particular appeal, the Applicant argued that "tourist use is not a dwelling", the Appeal Inspector went on to say; "Unfortunately for his clients, that view is incorrect. The proposal would involve the creation of two dwellings units. It might be possible to impose a condition limiting the way they were occupied, so that they could only be occupied for holiday or tourist purposes, but the fact remains that the units would be dwellings. Therefore the policies on residential or housing development in the countryside apply."

The Inspector goes on to state:-
"The proposal would result in the creation of two dwellings in an isolated rural location, in an area designated as of high landscape value"

The Inspector goes on to state:-
"The impact of this development would not by itself be very great, but it would be significant since it is necessary to bear in mind the possible cumulative effect of numerous small-scale developments in the countryside".

Taking Business Policy 11 & 12, and particularly Business Policy 12, this policy states that conversion of redundant buildings in the countryside to tourist use will generally be permitted as long as it complies with Housing Policy 11, as indicated previously within this report the proposal contravenes that policy, and therefore a refusal can be legitimately be made on that basis of Business Policy 12.

RECOMMENDATION In conclusion, the application site is not zoned for development and the proposal is contrary to both established general planning policy and 1982 Development Plan. Approval of the planning application

for the conversion of an inappropriate building, of which is tantamount to the creation of a new residential dwelling, would set an undesirable precedent for further such inappropriate development in the countryside. Accordingly, it is recommended that the planning application be refused.

### Party Status

I consider that the following meet the criteria of Government Circular 1/06 and should be afforded interested party status:

- Bride Parish Commissioners
- Highways Division

I consider that the following parties that made representations to the planning application do not meet the criteria of Government Circular 1/06 and should not be afforded interested party status:-

- S.P.M.C. & E
- The IOM Water Authority

### Recommendation

**Recommended Decision:** Refused

**Date of Recommendation:** 18.09.2007

### Conditions and Notes for Approval / Reasons and Notes for Refusal

- **C : Conditions for approval**
- **N : Notes attached to conditions**
- **R : Reasons for refusal**
- **O : Notes attached to refusals**

## **R 1.**

The conversion and of the garage into a tourist unit in this location is tantamount to the creation of a new residential dwelling in the countryside which would be contrary to the Isle of Man Planning Scheme (Development Plan) Order 1982 in that:-

- (a) the proposed development is not zoned for residential development; and
- (b) its residential development is contrary to the provisions of The Isle of Man Strategic Plan (20th June 2007), particularly General Policy 3, Environment Policy 2, Housing Policy 11, and Business Policy 12.

**Decision Made :** _________________________
**Committee Meeting Date :** _________________________

---

*Data sourced from the Isle of Man public planning register under the [Isle of Man Open Government Licence](https://www.gov.im/about-this-site/open-government-licence/).*
*Canonical page: https://planningportal.im/a/83767-bride-ballacregga-farm-conversion-garage/documents/1508677*
