**Document:** Officer Report Continuation Sheets
**Application:** 06/00886/B — Replace shop / store with a single dwelling
**Decision:** Permitted
**Decision Date:** 2006-09-26
**Parish:** Braddan
**Document Type:** report / officer_report
**Source:** https://planningportal.im/a/80750-braddan-2a-victoria-replacement-dwelling/documents/1470599

---

# Officer Report Continuation Sheets

4 Victoria Place - The window/barriers face directly onto the Samaritan car park. - Due to the direction of the sun raining (East/west) no light will be lost to 4. - The parking arrangements are no difference to most dwellings, (particularly on housing areas.) - The dwarf wall which might be included in any approval would take the parking provisions into account. - (The issue of demolition/re-build is not a planning matter.) 22 Victoria Terrace / la victoria plan - Issues of party walls are trivial matters. Any issues in proofing the walls/damp proofing would be covered in any subsequent building key application. - 1A is a workshop and not a residential property, whilst obesity still conducted. Does not have sinfant weight. 39 Farmhill Park / Owner (Victoria Terrace) I could - Did make an assessment on the impact on the rear properties due to photos submitted in the previous application. I would acceptable the height of the rear fence is incorrect. The property provides adequate parking provision within the site, the use of existing could/would significantly more traffic. I was also aware the properties along Victoria Terrace (1-12) as is clearly stated within my report (land use 2001) within my assessment. Chimney impacts - controlled by Bail Regs who control the size, distance, discharge. House prices are not a potential Planning Concern. APPLICATION No. ... Page of . as stated in my report 3 considers - Highway issues - Impacts upon the neighbouring properties - Residential amenity for the proposal - Impact upon the Reg Buildings & Street Scene - Precedent for further dev. ☐ as read The proposal would have a 5.5ms ridge height which would be approximately 1/12 height than nr 1A. The top of the ridge of the proposal is 15.5m away from the rear of 2 Victoria Terrace The hipped roof design would not have a significant impact upon the properties along Victoria Place (e.g. concavity, overhearing, loss of light. The ~~existing proposal~~ would be within an area of predominantly residential which provides adequate commingence space & parking provisions. It would replace a commercial property which could e would have The existing property which is of a poor design / appearance, which could be used as a commercial property within a area of predominantly residential area. The proposal provides adequate amenity space e parking provisions and in the hepts view would be appropriate to the site e to the area, without having a significant impact upon the neighbouring properties or upon the street scene.

---

*Data sourced from the Isle of Man public planning register under the [Isle of Man Open Government Licence](https://www.gov.im/about-this-site/open-government-licence/).*
*Canonical page: https://planningportal.im/a/80750-braddan-2a-victoria-replacement-dwelling/documents/1470599*