**Document:** Design Statement Timber Fencing **Application:** 18/00984/CON — Registered building consent for the removal of artificial hedging and oil tank, and installation of timber fencing to rear of building RB 38(retrospective) - in association with application 18/00983/GB **Decision:** Refused **Decision Date:** 2019-02-15 **Parish:** Malew **Document Type:** report / planning_statement **Source:** https://planningportal.im/a/29889-malew-george-hotel-parade-registered-building-consent-retrospective/documents/1332114 --- # Design Statement Timber Fencing ## Design Statement In Support Of The Retrospective Application For The Installation Of Timber Fencing At The George Hotel Approval for the installation of timber fencing was applied for under the general refurbishment proposals submitted December 2017. PA 17/01332/GB and Registered Building Consent application 17/01333/CON refers. The pub was closed for refurbishment January 2018 and due to time constraints associated with the need for it to re-open by Easter, in January we endeavoured to liaise with the planning officer in an effort to see if they had any concerns regarding the general ethos of the refurbishment proposals. In February we were asked to resubmit the application to clarify matters Highways had raised in relation to the ramp at the front of the building and car parking spaces to the rear. As far as we were aware these were the only matters of concern that needed to be addressed. Whilst the original target date of re-opening by Easter was missed, an opening date of 14th April was established. To meet licencing requirements a planning approval notice needed to be to hand prior to then. On 3rd April the planning officer advised that planning approval would be issued imminently under delegated powers albeit with the recommendation that a condition be applied confirming that no approval be granted to the erection or installation of any fencing within the site. It should be noted in Picture A that an 1850 mm high fence had already been installed at the site. Erection of the fencing that is a fundamental part of the ethos of the beer garden was already under way and there was simply no time left to argue the case. In addition, during that refurbishment a decision was made to change the boiler from oil to gas fired and relocate it within the plant room areas that already prevailed adjacent to the Kitchen at first floor level. This change meant the oil tank compound could be removed from within the beer garden area with the associated benefits of allowing the line of the beer garden to remain more or less as is meaning no encroachment into the car park area as previously envisaged. The 1850 mm high element of fence along the boundary with the public walkway is necessary from a privacy point of view and is appropriate in terms of replacing the previous 1850 mm high oil tank compound in part and lower faux hedging in part. Pic A -Boundary situation prior to works taking place Pic B -Boundary situation once oil tank compound and faux hedging had been removed Pic C - Completed installation as viewed from Farrant's Way The fence which crosses the car park at 900mm high has less impact on the surrounding area than the previous oil tank compound had as more of the rear face of the building is visible from Farrant's way. The fencing is totally in keeping with the other timber elements of the beer garden that were deemed appropriate under the previous application with the planning officer's comments reading as follows: ![A photograph showing the exterior of 'The George Hotel' with scaffolding erected around the upper levels and a stone wall in the foreground.](https://images.planningportal.im/2018/09/226696.jpg) "The installation of a new replacement timber pergola is unlikely to have any significant adverse impact on the wider character of the conservation area or the Registered Building. Similarly the installation of a small timber covered seating area within the beer garden is considered to be a reasonable level which is unlikely to have any significant adverse impacts on the character of the Registered Building or the wider Conservation Area. While these timber structures are not something you would readily see within a Conservation Area it is considered that their installation will help to accommodate the continuing use of the Registered Building without loss of any of its special interest." Her reasons for recommending refusal of the fence read as follows: "In the case of this application there is little information or evidence to fully understand the style and visual appearance of the proposed fence. That aside the site and its immediate surroundings are characterised by substantial stone walls which run along the boundary of the immediate properties enclosing their rear garden/yard areas. The installation of a timber boundary structure would be ![A photograph showing a parking area with cars, a stone wall, and a new wooden fence in front of a building labeled 'The George Hotel'.](https://images.planningportal.im/2018/09/226697.jpg) contrary to those stone boundary materials used in the Conservation Area and would result in an adverse impact on the character of the area and detriment the setting of the Registered Building". This application shows exactly what is proposed and rather than being at odds with the conservation area, as can be seen from the images below timber fencing and timber gates readily prevail in the area. Pic D -Fencing in car park adjacent to the George ![A photograph showing a single-story commercial building with a garage door, wooden fencing, and parked cars.](https://images.planningportal.im/2018/09/226699.jpg) Pic F -Manx to the Maxx adjacent to the Builders Yard ![A street-level photograph showing a stone boundary wall with a section of new timber fencing, a blue car in the foreground, and residential houses in the background.](https://images.planningportal.im/2018/09/226700.jpg) Pic H -Fencing/gate at 23 Farrants Way ![A photograph showing a large wooden gate set between stone walls with a speed limit sign, set against a backdrop of large buildings.](https://images.planningportal.im/2018/09/226701.jpg) Pic H -Fencing/gate at 23 Farrants Way ![A street-level photograph showing a cream-colored commercial building with a 'C J BRIDSON LTD' sign, flanked by attached properties, with vehicles parked in the foreground.](https://images.planningportal.im/2018/09/226702.jpg) Pic G -Builders Yard ![A photograph showing a paved driveway area with a wooden fence and gate on the left and a white garage building on the right, with a larger residential building in the background.](https://images.planningportal.im/2018/09/226703.jpg) Pic I-Fencing adjacent to Church Page 3 of 4 ![A photograph showing a wooden fence panel leaning against an existing stone wall in a paved area, with a car parked nearby and residential buildings in the background.](https://images.planningportal.im/2018/09/226698.jpg) ## Plc J- Similar, more weathered installation at Cat with no Tail ![A photograph showing the rear exterior of a white commercial building, likely a pub, with an outdoor patio area featuring picnic tables and a wooden fence in the foreground.](https://images.planningportal.im/2018/09/226704.jpg) ![A low-resolution photograph showing the rear of a stone building with a wooden fence installed along the boundary.](https://images.planningportal.im/2018/09/226705.jpg) Unlike those above, the timber here will be allowed to weather naturally which, as can be seen by in the photograph of a similar installation at The Cat with no Tail Pic J, means in a few months the silver nature of the timber will tone in well with the natural stone in the area as a whole. Timber is a product that would have naturally been around at the time The George was built, and what is proposed here is certainly more in keeping than the rusty corrugated sheeting on the boundary of Secret Pizza Company's Pic K and the graffiti shark on the wall immediately opposite The George where the public footpath runs past ### Summary and conclusion Pic K- Corrugated sheeting on the boundary of The Secret Pizza Company building The fencing as currently installed represents an appropriate improvement to that which prevailed prior to the works taking place. It is totally in keeping with the ethos of the beer garden as approved under PA 17/01332/GB and Registered Building Consent application 17/01333/CON, its height adjacent to the public footpath is necessary in terms of privacy with the overall effect being in keeping with both its registered building status and the conservation area as a whole. --- *Data sourced from the Isle of Man public planning register under the [Isle of Man Open Government Licence](https://www.gov.im/about-this-site/open-government-licence/).* *Canonical page: https://planningportal.im/a/29889-malew-george-hotel-parade-registered-building-consent-retrospective/documents/1332114*