**Document:** Officer Planning Report **Application:** 04/01414/R — Retrospective application for the installation of ceramic tiles to ground floor front elevation. **Decision:** Refused **Decision Date:** 2004-10-12 **Parish:** German **Document Type:** report / officer_report **Source:** https://planningportal.im/a/76463-german-16-michael-street-ceramic-tiles/documents/1201041 --- # Officer Planning Report Planning Report and Recommendations General Report Site Visited ☐ YES ☑ NO 14-14A Michael S is located within the Beel Conservation Area. This application is retrospective, seeking approval for the introduction of the ceramic tiles in place of the original painted render. In my opinion, the multi-multi-coloured tiles detract from both the building and the conservation area. A photograph appended to the file taken by myself in 2002 shows how the building looked prior to the addition of the tiles, simple and uncluttered. Finality it would appear that the owner of the property has also removed and replaced the painted shopfront and doors. The replacement lacks Signed ☐ [illegible] Date 21/9/4 Summary of objections/views The finesse of the original shopfront preferring also to block out sections of glazing. Recommendations Approve/Refuse Recommend Refusal. Signed ☐ [illegible] Date 21/9/4. ## Planning Report And Recommendations [Table omitted in markdown export] ### Considerations [Table omitted in markdown export] ### Written Representations We have received no private representations for this application. ### Consultations [Table omitted in markdown export] ### Policy ### Officer's Report The site represents the curtilage of two shop units on the southern side of Michael Street. The properties have historically been used as a chip shop and have recently been refurbished. There is however a problem with the proposed flue to the rear of the site - retrospective approval has recently been refused at Review. Proposed here is the replacement of the rendered part of the shop front with multi-coloured tiles. No information is given about the existing shopfront which existed prior to the replacement with these tiles which are very bright and not, to my mind conducive to a Conservation Area setting. It may be possible to paint over the tiles. The Conservation Officer has provided a photo of the site in 2002 and it is apparent that the shop front has been replaced without permission. It is not included on this application for retrospective approval. Whilst the shop front is in itself similar in appearance to the original shop front, I share the Conservation Officer's concerns about the appearance of the tiles. They should be removed or at least painted (if appropriate) to soften their appearance. ### Recommendation Recommended Decision: Refused Date of Recommendation: 22.09.2004 ### Conditions and Notes for Approval / Reasons and Notes for Refusal C: Conditions for approval N: Notes attached to conditions R: Reasons for refusal O: Notes attached to refusals R 1. The multi-coloured tiles as proposed would detract from the character and appearance of the building, and harm the appearance of the Peel Conservation Area as a whole. - 2. The Planning Committee has noted that the tiles have already been put in place. These tiles must be removed and the original finish reinstated within 3 months of the date that the decision becomes final in accordance with the letter with accompanies this decision notice. Decision Made: Refuse Committee Meeting Date: 30-9-04 dcreprec.doc [Table omitted in markdown export] --- *Data sourced from the Isle of Man public planning register under the [Isle of Man Open Government Licence](https://www.gov.im/about-this-site/open-government-licence/).* *Canonical page: https://planningportal.im/a/76463-german-16-michael-street-ceramic-tiles/documents/1201041*